Fildy Bejaoui

Temporary failed life knowledge acquisition, of life misconclusions (misconcluions about life), is when you draw the wrong conclusions about an aspect of life and aspects of the nature of existence. This, in turn, can lead to bad beliefs. Because in lieu of the actual conclusion, aka, the actual facts, you still risk using the conclusion as a fact, and use it as a baseline for your subsequent decisions.

Forced into specific circumstances, you enter life like it’s a maze and there is no way out of that game, you must go through the maze in order to win at life and you have no choice. And in truth winning at life is winning in yourself, because it’s all strictly about navigating the maze inside your kind, the meanders of your emotional reasoning, the meanders of life.

However, out of false parameters, you will build conclusions on top of this that will be a miss on a fact of life you’re trying to understand in your journey through existence.

→ That’s where pessimism comes from, by the way.

Pessimism and loss of faith is a struggle and temporary failure to understand the nature of life.

Some people have different attitudes and approach via a vis of life’s “challenges,” what are in actuality, hurdles, problems to solve, as I explain for the sake of evolution, and pessimism is one of those miss the mark responses.

A huge chunk of the point was missed, and it results in a strong decline of belief in the fundamental positivity and hopefulness of life.

False parameters are a misunderstanding of the base facts. It results from a flaw in reasoning and an analytical struggle, followed by a misconclusion to interpret the facts about a given situation and experience one has been forced into.

1. Base fact is incorrect
2. Yet the mind tries to understand [given situation] with this misassumption as the baseline
3. that leads to analytical struggle, as the mind tries to wrestle these two non-corresponding pieces, very much like two puzzle pieces that don’t fit, but are forced to fit even though they don’t, that is ultimately lost because the two pieces simply really just don’t fit (since the base fact is wrong)
4. You end up quitting, and conclude what you can, the little that you can, in lieu of the actual solution and explanation
5. Conclusion becomes a misconclusion

Mis-assumption

↓

Mis-conclusion

From a mis-assumption, you arrive at a mis-conclusion. Your entire reasoning leading you to the end is wrong, because the first assumption is incorrect. You can’t figure out the answer if you got it wrong from the start (if the information you were fed was incorrect, if you misunderstood, if you just didn’t know, etc).

For instance, when I was 11, my conclusion was to think that good people don’t deserve to be happy. This idea [good people don’t deserve to be happy], I knew it was wrong the second I thought it. It came from a misassumption on multiple parameters, aka base facts, that led up to this conclusion/that the conclusion was born from and built on.

This conclusion was untrue, period, because that’s not even remotely what anything going on back then was about. I was honestly just chilling in my victim mentality back in those days and totally glorifying myself (not that I’m a bad person or anything and so the statement was incorrect for this reason, but there’s a serious lack of nuance in that statement let’s be honest).

This was a misinterpretation of the facts present in a situation.

Statements like “it can’t be done/it’s impossible,” “I’ll never be happy,” or worse, “I’m being punished,” (as I explain, nobody cares about you enough to punish you for something) are a struggle subsequently followed by a failure to interpret the situation one is in.

This misconclusion happens because the mind wants to fill in the blanks. The goal is to understand, but even if it can’t understand, remaining answer-less is impossible and generally too uncomfortable. “There must be a resolution.” thinketh the part of you responsible for survival that will try to get you out of that existential crisis, because, due to its existential nature, you (the mind) finds it a threat to its survival. Something that generally threatens your existential wellbeing, your sense of wellbeing, peace, or your balance of contentment, is seen a threat because it upsets your happy balance. It’s a survival threat because you can’t survive if there’s a giant existential problem weighing on you, because by extension, it puts into question all of your existence, because it forces you to reconsider the nature of existence itself.

For instance, for people who think that they are being targeted by negative things a lot (one possible statement, “I’m a shit magnet ,” I’ve genuinely heard that before), the idea here is that there’s a fundamental force, larger than you, larger than life, the size of life itself, that’s personally attacking you and has it out to get you.

Obviously that’s not what’s happening at all (→ you aren’t a shit magnet, the bigger picture of the how and the why just happens to be eluding you at this time because you’re 1- in too much pain to think, 2- currently don’t have all the facts). But in lieu of the actual facts, there is very little wiggle room for you to conclude anything else because your analysis and understanding of the original situation is incomplete. So out of an incomplete palette of facts, you conclude what you can, the little that you can, circumstantially, and you misconclude.

That’s temporary failed life knowledge acquisition.

Because your goal is to come to understand life, and obviously the less you are attacked the more you can think straight. However, it’s in darkness, at the risk of sounding emo, that you can conclude the most about life, because that’s where the depth is hiding and exists. The biggest life knowledge is found is in the “esoteric” (what is hidden).

Your exploration of darker things is an exploration of life itself. And I personally invite you to enjoy the journey (before anyone comes at me, yes, I know, yes, I understand).

That means any problem you’re faced with, you need to analyse it in as much of an analytical way as possible, sans despair and misery (as in, feel them, but they basically don’t need to make you spiral down into a pit leading straight to despair boulevard on its way to depression town).

While your feelings themselves can tell you what you want to do, they’re usually not particularly as far as facts gathering is concerned which is why I personally don’t care too much to look at them unless I’m about decision making (basically I don’t neglect my feelings but it’s a me thing, I don’t like human subjectivity and it pisses me off so I tend to think with my analytical eyes and discard everything else and I only check out subjective stuff to the extent I’ll be able to make decisions that won’t lead me to regrettable decisions I’ll bite my fingers over, as we say, way too long down the line. Otherwise it is physically not a necessary point of focus for me, but may be for you).

1. What does this situation and its elements tell you about life?
2. Do your conclusions seem accurate to your inner knowing?
3. When you compare them to your inner knowing, does it feel accurate, or do you sense a discrepancy?
4. If you do, following that lead, where and what does it lead to?

Useful questions to ask.

A final example from somebody that I used to know, who one day told me, “let’s be real, people only do things because they want something in return, they’d never give for free without expecting something in return.” That statement was laced and happened when she was observing another party she was in a relationship with.

That conclusion was simply untrue because it didn’t actually come from the physical reality in front of her but from what she projected and saw in that reality. She was all too happy to fill in the blanks with her own past experiences because the mind loves to prove itself right with and in the angstiest of scenarios, as a protection mechanism (if you are pre-emptively disappointed and expect nothing, nothing can hurt you. Therefore, the mind loves to disappoint itself and rush to these kinds of disappointing conclusions when it feels threatened. This mechanism itself, which happens to everyone, is triggered by something that, in itself, created undue disappointment that didn’t already exist in the mind).

The reality when observed from the outside the biases of the party involved leads to completely different conclusions when you actually look at the opposite party, and the source of their actions. But that’s not something the involved party cares about anyway because it is more about: “which scenario fit the avenues I am prepared to walk?” if an element to be interpret goes beyond an existing road, an existing possible interpretation leading to a specific life pathway the individual is ready to walk, it will either be misunderstood, or discarded, or sometimes the mind will literally barely see it, because it’ll see its signs, see that they don’t fit into any pre-emptively loaded scenarios, and will not seek to analyse what it sees. If you’d then ask the conscious individual about that thing, they’ll tell you they haven’t noticed, because in their subconscious, they haven’t catalogued it at all.

The subsequent misery that came from it sends the signal: “it is impossible to get what I want.” It is obvious that this is a misconclusion born out of misery and a giant misunderstanding of life.

The best tip: if a conclusion you’re drawing about life leads you down despair road, it is an inaccuracy. ↓

That’s because the nature of life is fundamentally to be productive. As I said, the universe isn’t against inducing some pain to achieve its evolution. But destruction for the sake of pointless tearing something down does not exist, because it would be self-destructive for the universe, → it would lead to the end of existence. The universe is going towards evolution, therefore only productive things are enabled to exist in life as per this trajectory (these are all the same things, by the way, life is consciousness, the universe is consciousness, so the universe is life, etc).

Meaning that if something is fundamentally hopeless in your eyes, you misconcluded. Period Because objectively nothing that leads against productivity (the enabling of positive and constructive, building up outcomes) can physically exist.

Meaning that anything without a fundamentally positive value can’t exist. That means that whatever conclusion you drew, that feels like it’s leading you into a wall, is inaccurate.

The feeling: a sinking feeling in your stomach, visually may look like shoulders dropping as you give up and some of your life force leaves,